Kindly.... you are frothing over gossip. It was "I've heard that Marr's management did XYZ". I'm not denying that there's truth in some elements of what this guy has said about Moz, the industry and the labels etc because that is his professional area. But he's not in Johnny's camp, and hasn't claimed to be, and so he's just repeating things he's heard. Shit-stirring.
When it comes to Johnny, I trust his word more than I trust what an insider might have heard - especially one with an axe to grind about the Pete Galli mess. And, as I asked at the time too - if all these gossips were running to Moz with tales of Johnny's nefarious plans, why didn't they tell him the truth of the trademark situation before he embarrassed himself? He came out of that mess looking like a gullible fool who had no clue what was real and what wasn't. And if the main man doesn't have the full picture then I am certain that #405 on the guest list doesn't either.
I hear the "kindly" . . . thank you. And I am aware I sounded a bit hysterical, too . . .
To clarify a bit, I don't think Johnny "nefarious" for reasons you
@Odbmke point out:
I actually feel for Johnny now , because in order for him to (deservedly) cash in on his early career, he has to work with someone who is suuuuuuper unreliable. Since Morrissey was the singer, he lucked out in that he doesn't really have to use the name "The Smiths" to sell tickets since he has the recognizable voice, and there is no real penalty for having someone other than Johnny play guitar. Johnny on the other hand needs to essentially find a karaoke singer if he wants to play his Smiths catalog, and a lot more is lost in the nostalgia in having a different singer vs different guitarist.
Yes, I think this completely understandable that Johnny might want this. And I think he needs a singer to maximise his magnificent music. And maybe—who knows?—he is seeing this now, after the series of solo records.
Where I perhaps start to hysterically 'froth'

is this:
At this point, as a fan of the Smiths music, I'd totally be ok with and buy a ticket to see "The Smiths" with Johnny and a different singer.
The question is:
could there be truth in this? Can you tell us
@Odbmke if you know or have good reason to believe that what BF turned down was either
(1) some form of Smiths Mark 2 or could it just be
(2) Marr and Flowers perform the Smiths—which does seem far more likely.
This is the point on which my hysterical frothing hangs . . .
If this were (1) Smiths Mark 2, then Morrissey's reaction is far more understandable — far, far more — than if it were only (2).
I really do think feeling excluded or "cancelled" rom the Smiths like this would be a cut unfathomably deep. My heart truly goes out to him if something like this has happened.
More thoughts here. Seeing connections I didn't make before . . . Alas, little time to say them.
But anything you could say
@Odbmke about (1) versus (2) would be most appreciated.
It really does seem as though it goes to the very CRUX of the matter. At least, it does to me.