A
howdy! the conversation and discussion is always about men as women lurking around womens loos .... back to your comment about the point of interest only being concerned with genitalia, which I agree with.Nobody seems to have a problem with ‘trans’* men using the male toilets and changing rooms. Really shows where peoples point of interest is doesn’t it…
His legal advice would have been to say absolutely nothing for now. Kevin Spacey commented on the Rapp allegation very early on, saying he could not remember anything about it, and apologising to Rapp - that was then interpreted as an admission of guilt. Brand would be mad to say anything specifically about anonymous allegations.I'm disappointed Russell Brand doesn't seem to have expressed concern about his alleged victims' experiences, which I feel would be consistent with the humane ethical positions he's assumed in recent years. Yet as Sea Salt & others pointed out, two things could be true at once here; abusive behavior by him in the past, and major societal forces using that now in an effort to shut him up.
That's an easy one...
Oh, come on, Gregor, he's recovering from dengue fever...I have never experienced a duller period in my 20+ years as a Moz fan. His career is in shambles, his new music is some of his worst yet, there are no news except the occasional bad news. No interviews. Nothing. Absolute bollocks.
Well that makes sense, and there is nothing to disagree with there. Shared unisex toilets and changing rooms have and don't work, having private toilets and changing rooms that are in an individual space that are unisex work, aka a cubical with a basin, toilet, shower etc. which has a lock on the door, all the cubicals are lined up in an open corridor and there is privacy when you lock the door.When talking about safe spaces, the issue is not about trans people - trans people are not a risk to kids, and trans people are not a risk to women.
But some men are a risk to kids, and some men are a risk to women.
The issue is about keeping men out of women's spaces. It's not about trans people. It's not about transphobia.
The word 'trans' is vague and imprecise. It can mean lots of different things - from someone who has taken hormones and had major surgery - right through to someone who just feels like they are in the wrong body but has had no 'treatment'. And that is the problem. Whereas we all know what we mean by 'men' and 'women'. So when it comes to safeguarding, the definition of 'trans' is irrelevant. That's why they are called women's sex-based rights.Just curious. So what is your definition of a trans person in regards to what you said above?
And now, in regards to what you said here above.
What is your definition of a trans woman, one that naturally feels they should use a woman’s bathroom?
When talking about safe spaces, the issue is not about trans people - trans people are not a risk to kids, and trans people are not a risk to women.
But some men are a risk to kids, and some men are a risk to women.
The issue is about keeping men out of women's spaces. It's not about trans people. It's not about transphobia.
Doesn't bother me. Doesn't affect me. Ask women. Let women speak.So what bathroom should these trans people use?
When talking about safe spaces, the issue is not about trans people - trans people are not a risk to kids, and trans people are not a risk to women.
So what bathroom should these trans people use?
Doesn't bother me. Doesn't affect me. Ask women. Let women speak.
I don't have strong views about bathrooms. Many women do not like 'unisex' bathrooms - but I suppose ultimately people do have a choice about where they go, as long as they are not too far from home, or there is another toilet available somewhere else that is not unisex!Yes, but none of the issues you’ve brought up in this thread affect you.
Ok, cool. Then you don’t mind trans women
using a woman-only space.
sorry. lost me on the latter part.I don't have strong views about bathrooms. Many women do not like 'unisex' bathrooms - but I suppose ultimately we do have a choice about where we go, as long as we are not too far from home, or there is another toilet available somewhere else that is women-only.
I do have strong views about places accessed by vulnerable women who don't necessarily have a 'choice' about whether or nor to access those spaces - e.g. rape crisis centres, inpatient facilities, in particular for those involuntarily committed, and prisons.
Agree. Woman only groups and spaces should definitely be made available.
It’s simply a bit strange, that the concern for a trans person’s safety in regards to them being made to use men’s bathrooms hasn’t been brought up.
Nobody seems to have a problem with ‘trans’* men using the male toilets and changing rooms. Really shows where peoples point of interest is doesn’t it…
I am also aware that the US is a very patriarchal country, religion is still strong, the American dream is still there. I am from the UK, I think there is another type of dream going on but doesn’t involve politics and a vision of the perfect life and body, that is passing over from America. I have noticed that American social politics are extreme, and are either or, almost vivid either way. The UK is becoming more like the US, sadly because the UK is loosing its culture without realising it. Although I love ya, wish you’d stay where you are. American history isn’t as long and complex as the UK, but is very interesting and seeped in screen and set, not in an obvious way.
His legal advice would have been to say absolutely nothing for now. Kevin Spacey commented on the Rapp allegation very early on, saying he could not remember anything about it, and apologising to Rapp - that was then interpreted as an admission of guilt. Brand would be mad to say anything specifically about anonymous allegations.
Apparently there was a joke going round the Tavistock that - if we keep going like this there won't be any gay kids left.
STEPHANIE MORRISSEY'
It has now, and is a worthy concern too. What do you think? Are unisex loos the answer? Whether we like it or not, like much going on these days ('when I were a lad..')
Interesting what you say about the American vision of life and body being exported to the 'empire'. I think the sparkly-pink-plastic-laden film Barbie started to address similar expectations and standards but only seemed to loop back around to saying that ultimately the masquerade, as Germaine Greer puts it , is satisfying enough.
I don’t believe that somebody can say to me, “You are not a woman, you’re a cis-woman, I’m the real thing.” I’m very happy to believe that men make better women than women do because we know from what it takes to turn you into a woman. We used to call it conditioning, nobody even mentions that anymore, where you learn how to dress, how to speak, how to love pink and all the other things that make you a girlie girl. We had to learn all of those things and they are fake, they are a masquerade....And now we have to accept the masquerade as the thing that is more real than we are at this point, as the author of the Female Eunuch, I can’t do anything else....
I figured that would be a common response alright but Russell Brand is an uncommon person, very articulate, able to express emotions on the wing, who has built up a profile based on community, love, forgiveness, truth, healing and so on. You'd think this great challenge would be the ideal opportunity for him to conjure up another moral lesson? However, I guess there are plenty baying for blood, have been for years, and he knows it. But still. It's a hard one. Hopefully he has support, having openly admitted mental illness and other vulnerabilities. Hopefully women hurt by him have too.
If Morrissey posted on Morrissey-Central tomorrow under the banner
'I HAVE BROKEN THE VEIL, I AM STEPHANIE MORRISSEY'
I would think, well you hid that well - and I would be alarmed and bewildered.
I don't think he has that stance on gender identity, he seems to be an observer and he is a voice and confidence pillar for those that have neither.