Post Whatever You Are Thinking At This Very Moment

nicky wire's legs said:
i bet there's a virgin in heaven wishing you were with her every time you read a nabokov novel, isnt that right, audrey?!
Click to expand...

Well, no, because the doctrine is based on getting an erection, and I don’t get an erection when I read a Nabokov novel.

For someone who doesn’t even like the word “penis,” you do ask your share of questions about mine.

:eek:
 
I said I wasn’t going to take any more panadol tablets, but I got my highest reading yet this morning, 39.3 (102.74°F), so I had to take another one. I found myself saying “my God” over and over again because I was looking for divine intervention. I was searching for some sort of solace because when my temperature is that high everything starts making my skin crawl— my phone, the television, this website; I had to switch off my phone and put it on the floor, I couldn’t have it that close to me. I’ll definitely be one of those people who suddenly finds God when I’m on my deathbed. As soon as the fever is gone I won’t try contacting God again until the next time I need something. Sorry for only using you when I want something, Lord.





Jesus, forgive me!
 
Been in the pub with a couple pf people this afternoon who have heard a rumour (from the same guy who told me about the Oasis reunion gigs before it was announced) that Johnny is thinking about Peter Hook type gigs where he plays Smiths albums along with solo stuff. The Peter Hook ones have been really successful so reckon this could be a fabulous idea.
 
Roman Holiday said:
Well, no, because the doctrine is based on getting an erection, and I don’t get an erection when I read a Nabokov novel.

For someone who doesn’t even like the word “penis,” you do ask your share of questions about mine.

:eek:
Click to expand...
I wouldn't read too much into it, auds! My interest is purely scientific, an inquiry into how one can go through life with such a comically absurd little appendage and to what baffling degree this absurd little appendage influences one's goals and sense of meaning and self importance.
 
nicky wire's legs said:
I wouldn't read too much into it, auds! My interest is purely scientific, an inquiry into how one can go through life with such a comically absurd little appendage and to what baffling degree this absurd little appendage influences one's goals and sense of meaning and self importance.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see. I have a purely scientific interest in them, too. They’re definitely comically absurd, but they’re also pretty sinister. I think they’re a net negative—and the gender that has them ought to be kindly phased out so that humanity might persist in a gentle androgynous/femme mode. You seem to have come to a different conclusion, though, since you enjoy these pundits who are into “traditional masculinity” (culture wars version).
 
Roman Holiday said:
Ah, I see. I have a purely scientific interest in them, too. They’re definitely comically absurd, but they’re also pretty sinister. I think they’re a net negative—and the gender that has them ought to be kindly phased out so that humanity might persist in a gentle androgynous/femme mode. You seem to have come to a different conclusion, though, since you enjoy these pundits who are into “traditional masculinity” (culture wars version).
Click to expand...
well maybe it helps that their existence doesnt make me feel diminished and/or emasculated?! 🤷‍♀️ also, i like having things like electricity and plumbing and housing and such. so yeah, i enjoy having men about!
 
nicky wire's legs said:
well maybe it helps that their existence doesnt make me feel diminished and/or emasculated?! 🤷‍♀️ also, i like having things like electricity and plumbing and housing and such. so yeah, i enjoy having men about!
Click to expand...

I don’t feel diminished or emasculated by the existence of other penises. Like I said, it’s impersonal and purely scientific for me. I’m just going by the data.

You wouldn’t need the male of the species to have electricity, plumbing, and housing anymore. This is the 21st century. You would just need robots.
 
Roman Holiday said:
I don’t feel diminished or emasculated by the existence of other penises. Like I said, it’s impersonal and purely scientific for me. I’m just going by the data.

You wouldn’t need the male of the species to have electricity, plumbing, and housing anymore. This is the 21st century. You would just need robots.
Click to expand...
Oh right, so now that we have everything we need, we can just do away with those who built the modern world.

I'm not a third world immigrant, audrey.
 
nicky wire's legs said:
Oh right, so now that we have everything we need, we can just do away with those who built the modern world.
Click to expand...

If men are expendable and redundant, then they don’t need to be kept around. They and their accomplishments can still be appreciated. There can be a museum.
 
nicky wire's legs said:
What a gross way of thinking.
Click to expand...

Dreaming of a better future = gross? :confused:

Just because the modern world’s been built doesn’t mean we have to freeze all progress. It’s far from perfect. The ancient Greeks and Romans gave us a lot of greatness, but we don’t go around in togas worshipping bulls. Refinement means getting rid of the dross and obsolescence.
 
Roman Holiday said:
Dreaming of a better future = gross? :confused:

Just because the modern world’s been built doesn’t mean we have to freeze all progress. It’s far from perfect. The ancient Greeks and Romans gave us a lot of greatness, but we don’t go around in togas worshipping bulls. Refinement means getting rid of the dross and obsolescence.
Click to expand...
Grow up :rolleyes: no wonder you don't have a girlfriend!
 
Roman Holiday said:
Ah, I see. I have a purely scientific interest in them, too. They’re definitely comically absurd, but they’re also pretty sinister. I think they’re a net negative—and the gender that has them ought to be kindly phased out so that humanity might persist in a gentle androgynous/femme mode. You seem to have come to a different conclusion, though, since you enjoy these pundits who are into “traditional masculinity” (culture wars version).
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom