Morrissey on "Later... with Jools Holland" (London, Oct. 3, 2017) - reminder / reports

UPDATE Oct. 7:

Posted by an anonymous person:



Posted by docinwestchester:




UPDATE Oct. 6:

Posted by Peanut:

The full show is tomorrow (Sat. 7th) at 11pm on BBC Two, not today as written in OP.


Posted by Springhealedkev:

I was at the Jools Holland show and he did 3 songs. The other 2 are ... ' I wish you lonely ' and 'all the young people must fall in love ' ... got so close to him but yet so far... thought we might see them in the bar after , but no.


Note posted by Johnny Barleycorn:

This edition is the short version. The full show will be on Friday.





Link to jools.holland.official / Instagram posted by an anonymous person:



40889_morrissey_jools.jpg






 
Last edited:
Hillary wasn’t up to the job. She ran a terrible campaign and was lucky to finish runner-up.

Grab a sick bucket and watch this if you haven’t seen it already.



Not a satire, apparently.



Eskiltuna will therefore, I imagine, be run on a system of proportional representation. I think that works in smaller nations, but rarely in larger countries.

Obviously I exclude Germany, where it was necessary to impose PR on them after the war to prevent them burning the continent to the ground for a third time.

More t-shirt madness from a man who ruled his workers with an iron fist. In a leather glove.


Holy f***ing shit! I made it fifty seconds in before hurling. It is satire but they don't know it. The whole "I'm pretending to write now" thing is sickening, and then there's more.
 
Acton is a living, breathing example of the Dunning-Kruger effect!
You remind me of the little wimpy nerd in Mr.Mercedes who divides his home time between staring at a computer screen and getting jerked off by his mother. I wonder which one you prefer most.
 
yep! brilliant ! :thumb:

thanks !
I think I'll hold off judging the songs until I hear the studio versions in the context of the full album. However, I had hoped that 'Spent The Day In Bed' wasn't gonna be the best song of the lot but I suspect it might be. Anyway I'm not blown away by the new songs but the new album as a whole might blow me away. I'll keep an open mind. So far they sound to me like bsides from an album like Ringleader. I shouldn't compare but they aren't as good as the Quarry songs Moz did on Jools. Or the Ringleader songs. With all that said I'm hoping they sound great on the album and I'll eat my words.
 
So does Spent. And quite a few on WP. That might be why he said at one he had loads of material.

He’s getting through more gaffer tape than the road crew.
I was thinking that too. Do you think after the events of last year he may have added things to certain songs?
 
.

they're the best thing I've heard today
, and maybe tomorrow too ! :D

hearing these, now I'm more excited to hear the album. They've got a nice bite and vibe these new songs.




I think I'll hold off judging the songs until I hear the studio versions in the context of the full album. However, I had hoped that 'Spent The Day In Bed' wasn't gonna be the best song of the lot but I suspect it might be. Anyway I'm not blown away by the new songs but the new album as a whole might blow me away. I'll keep an open mind. So far they sound to me like bsides from an album like Ringleader. I shouldn't compare but they aren't as good as the Quarry songs Moz did on Jools. Or the Ringleader songs. With all that said I'm hoping they sound great on the album and I'll eat my words.
 
I agree with the message, but that isn't the point. The contradiction just struck me. We will never know if the band members agree with the message or not, all we know is they HAVE to wear the T-shirts whether they like it or not. Hope this clears up the error in your thinking.

You don't have to agree with the message. It makes no difference.
He does what he wants. As he is free to do so.
Do you really think he would take into considering about what some trolls on this website would advise him?

Besides, if we will never know if the band members agree with the message or not, there is no point in arguing about that, is there?

All we know is, he wants them to wear them, but they can say no if they don't want to. If it is that important to them. There could be consequences of course but maybe not. We don't know.
He is the boss and they get paid by him. So strange eh?

I think it is not that important to them and anyway how do you know they don't agree? Did they say anything about it?

There might be an error or more in my thinking but not on this point.

By the way, did you really spread the misleading information about the two other songs Moz was going to do on Later with Jools Holland?

Kewpie accused you of being a troll for that, isn't it?
She seems much more reliable in her information then you.
 
Hillary wasn’t up to the job. She ran a terrible campaign and was lucky to finish runner-up.

Grab a sick bucket and watch this if you haven’t seen it already.



Not a satire, apparently.



Eskiltuna will therefore, I imagine, be run on a system of proportional representation. I think that works in smaller nations, but rarely in larger countries.

Obviously I exclude Germany, where it was necessary to impose PR on them after the war to prevent them burning the continent to the ground for a third time.

More t-shirt madness from a man who ruled his workers with an iron fist. In a leather glove.



" after the war to prevent them burning the continent to the ground for a third time."

Their own country was being burned to the ground so it might take them some time.
And as the allied forces learned from what happened to that country after ww1 they invested billions of dollars in it (The Marshall plan) to prevent that and offered protection against Russia and the completely f***ing crazy communist system.

Of course it was in the interest of the capitalist system.
Thank you Jesus, thank you Lord.
 
Hillary wasn’t up to the job. She ran a terrible campaign and was lucky to finish runner-up.

Grab a sick bucket and watch this if you haven’t seen it already.



Not a satire, apparently.



Eskiltuna will therefore, I imagine, be run on a system of proportional representation. I think that works in smaller nations, but rarely in larger countries.

Obviously I exclude Germany, where it was necessary to impose PR on them after the war to prevent them burning the continent to the ground for a third time.

More t-shirt madness from a man who ruled his workers with an iron fist. In a leather glove.



In Sweden a vote is a vote and the one with the most votes get the most votes to break it down so even a child understands. Bigger countries have voting systems so difficult that many cannot even vote and in the end no one is sure if Russia mixed with the voting system or not.

In those countries a president with the most votes does not win the election and instead has to pretend to save the planet for a living. In those countries people that no one know who they are get to decide and a part of that country that resembles the appendicitis where mostly old folk live decides the entire outcome of the election.

If any election is rigged it is the american one and not the poxy voting within a fringe party like UKIP which should be a united kingdom broadband supplier and not the name of a party with only one agenda.

Then when someone wins the american election that someone has to drop to their knees and ask federal law men and other shady characters if they can do this and that or not. In the end no one knows who runs the country and therefor everyone need to stuff their homes with guns and send their loved ones off to war which means kids who used to play Playstation now get to do that with a drone in real life from the inside of a container out in nowhere.

The more complicated a voting system is the less chance it has to be fair in the end. We could all vote online and decide on everything but they will never trust the public with that and looking at some people maybe some shady characters with some kind of degree should decide everything without the general public having to vote at all.

The american voting system has an inbuilt handbrake that those that are in power can use whenever things are going wrong. Why one vote is a vote won't work in larger countries is because everyone knows that the people in those countries are so badly educated they cannot even use a micro cause they put a cat in it and then sued the company that built the microwave oven while accidentally scorching themselves cause they poured hot coffee from McDonalds all over them.

God bless America!
 
He just doesn't have it anymore. Neither do these songs. Just my opinion of course.
 
In Sweden a vote is a vote and the one with the most votes get the most votes to break it down so even a child understands. Bigger countries have voting systems so difficult that many cannot even vote and in the end no one is sure if Russia mixed with the voting system or not.

In those countries a president with the most votes does not win the election and instead has to pretend to save the planet for a living. In those countries people that no one know who they are get to decide and a part of that country that resembles the appendicitis where mostly old folk live decides the entire outcome of the election.

If any election is rigged it is the american one and not the poxy voting within a fringe party like UKIP which should be a united kingdom broadband supplier and not the name of a party with only one agenda.

Then when someone wins the american election that someone has to drop to their knees and ask federal law men and other shady characters if they can do this and that or not. In the end no one knows who runs the country and therefor everyone need to stuff their homes with guns and send their loved ones off to war which means kids who used to play Playstation now get to do that with a drone in real life from the inside of a container out in nowhere.

The more complicated a voting system is the less chance it has to be fair in the end. We could all vote online and decide on everything but they will never trust the public with that and looking at some people maybe some shady characters with some kind of degree should decide everything without the general public having to vote at all.

The american voting system has an inbuilt handbrake that those that are in power can use whenever things are going wrong. Why one vote is a vote won't work in larger countries is because everyone knows that the people in those countries are so badly educated they cannot even use a micro cause they put a cat in it and then sued the company that built the microwave oven while accidentally scorching themselves cause they poured hot coffee from McDonalds all over them.

God bless America!
UKIP doesn't just have one agenda. Yes they won their main objective, but they will not rest until Brexit has been carried out to the level at which the people voted for. They are also the party of the people, for all of the UK and not just this pathetic London London London crap.

There was something strange about the recent UKIP leadership election. When they announced the winner, I had a quick look for him on twitter (I had not heard of him) and to my surprise, the guy had been following me on there for months WTH? Desperation maybe? But he didn't have the support or following as Anne-Marie did and a lot of people had not heard of him either. From listening to him a few days after the announcement, he doesn't seem to be very competent as a leader. He thinks that because he served out in Helmand Province for the entire duration, this equals suitability for a long term leader, regardless of policies or delivering them.
 
All the young people


"In modern Britain everyone seems petrified to officially say what we all say in private."
-Morrissey birthday manifesto 2017

"They never stop talking, but they aren't allowed to say-
they cannot say what they really mean.
"
-All the Young People
 
UKIP doesn't just have one agenda. Yes they won their main objective, but they will not rest until Brexit has been carried out to the level at which the people voted for. They are also the party of the people, for all of the UK and not just this pathetic London London London crap.

There was something strange about the recent UKIP leadership election. When they announced the winner, I had a quick look for him on twitter (I had not heard of him) and to my surprise, the guy had been following me on there for months WTH? Desperation maybe? But he didn't have the support or following as Anne-Marie did and a lot of people had not heard of him either. From listening to him a few days after the announcement, he doesn't seem to be very competent as a leader. He thinks that because he served out in Helmand Province for the entire duration, this equals suitability for a long term leader, regardless of policies or delivering them.

Their one agenda was to win the EU election and they won that and now the process is underway to leave it. They can never present a budget or anything just like swedish nazis when I asked them about that. These parties and movements would never be able to fill seats and go to boring meetings and spend time on things like how the 80 year old Margot can be helped with her problems from ageing.

You hate London and those in power but UKIP will never help you with your issues and instead threaten to really annoy those in power which will mean those in power will probably take away things you really need.

The disgruntled voters are just armageddon worshippers but when push comes to shove they won't be up for it cause they are eating tacos to Dancing with the stars.

We need someone or something with wisdom to take in the entire picture. UKIP is the controlled opposition and at the moment there are no parties prepared to match the criterias for what is needed to tackle todays issues. That goes for the whole of Europe and probably the entire world.
 
Their one agenda was to win the EU election and they won that and now the process is underway to leave it. They can never present a budget or anything just like swedish nazis when I asked them about that. These parties and movements would never be able to fill seats and go to boring meetings and spend time on things like how the 80 year old Margot can be helped with her problems from ageing.

You hate London and those in power but UKIP will never help you with your issues and instead threaten to really annoy those in power which will mean those in power will probably take away things you really need.

The disgruntled voters are just armageddon worshippers but when push comes to shove they won't be up for it cause they are eating tacos to Dancing with the stars.

We need someone or something with wisdom to take in the entire picture. UKIP is the controlled opposition and at the moment there are no parties prepared to match the criterias for what is needed to tackle todays issues. That goes for the whole of Europe and probably the entire world.
What you are describing is what Anne-Marie was manifesting. She is starting a new party now anyway, so at least her supporters can still vote for her. :thumb:
 
What you are describing is what Anne-Marie was manifesting. She is starting a new party now anyway, so at least her supporters can still vote for her. :thumb:

Yes cause they get bored. These people are the real losers, not the chavs in tracksuits. They will never care about real issues and only wanna compensate for the broken toys that dominated their childhood when their mum and dad were to drunk to even feed them.

Look at Anne Marie and see the poverty in her eyes and the neglect. That woman became a lesbian cause men in her life were wife beating alcoholics. She knew then and she knows now she was at the bottom of the social ladder and then the muslims came in very handy for her to point at them as the problem instead of focusing on the few extremists and deal with her own miserable background.

How can she ever solve the problems and she hasn't even got the brains and education required to lace your shoes. If she or the swedish nazis ever get some power it will end in chaos cause chaos is what they need to attract voters.

Maybe she can take care of the problems in her own country first like she is saying to the muslims?
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom