There Is A Light That Must Be Switched On - Morrissey talks to John Riggers Apr. 2018 - M. Central

A huge interview - brace yourselves. Bowie, politics, animal welfare, more politics...
Album underway... Possible gigs (Austria/Finland) in July and much more:
(copied here in full incase it vanishes and as it's easier to read).

Untitled-6.jpg


http://www.morrisseycentral.com/messagesfrommorrissey/there-is-a-light-that-must-be-switched-on

JOHN: Thanks for talking to me because I know you don’t talk to the press anymore. I can guess the reasons why, but can you explain them now?

MORRISSEY: Yes. There is simply no point. They don’t print what you say, and they print what you didn’t say. There’s hardly any point in me being there! The function of reporting has disappeared. Now, all journalists are megastars and the only aim of their interview is to express and establish their own personal views, and to hell with whatever the interviewee says.

JOHN: So why have you agreed to talk to me?

MORRISSEY: Because you’re not from The Guardian.

JOHN: SPIN magazine have recently termed you a fascist. I’ve never known SPIN be so aggressive towards anyone before. I am very shocked by SPIN. Are you aware of their accusation?

MORRISSEY: Yes, and I will be interested to see how they explain themselves in court. It’s unfortunate to take any publication to court, but sometimes you must, and this is one of those times because otherwise the press can succeed in dictating an ugly view, which they fully realize can place you in danger.

JOHN: Why do you think the press suddenly see you as a difficult figure?

MORRISSEY: Because I speak from the heart. The mainstream media will only encourage pop artists who have nothing to say. We are meant to keep our nose out of politics even though we are all living, breathing humans and as much a part of 2018 life as anyone else.

JOHN: You are 59 next month, is this a concern?

MORRISSEY: We might as well call it 60 and get it over with.

JOHN: How old are you in your heart?

MORRISSEY: Good question! 165.

JOHN: Did you ever think your social theories would be as much sought after as your songs?

MORRISSEY: They were always one and the same thing.

JOHN: You have been accused of supporting Brexit by the press. Why are they so concerned, do you think?

MORRISSEY: Accused is the correct word! It isn’t possible to be congratulated for supporting Brexit, is it? That should tell you all you need to know about the outstanding lack of neutrality within the British press. It’s all a pointless argument anyway because, as you’ve surely noticed, Brexit did not happen. The EUwouldn’t allow it to happen. It is now a dead issue. The people said Leave but the EUsaid no. People wanted to leave the EU because of the complete erosion of freedom under EU rules, and the fair-minded majority now see in even more frightening ways how very much they are hated by the EU, not to mention the British political elite. How England is today is a country that is not leaving the EU. Hungary, Italy, Finland and Poland will leave before the UK is allowed to. A second referendum is muttered about but people don’t realize how a second referendum will see an ever higher percentage of people voting Leave. What then? A third referendum?

JOHN: Did you actually vote to leave?

MORRISSEY: No, I haven’t ever voted. I don’t have sufficient faith in the circus of politics … and … you can see why! It is a moral disaster on every level. Even Tesco wouldn’t employ Diane Abbott.

JOHN: Your music explains fully how you feel, and your audience is now more dedicated to you than ever before. Is this why you continue? I remember you were talking about retirement in 1992!

MORRISSEY: Unfortunately I cannot retire from myself! If I could, I would!

JOHN: Do you still listen to The Smiths?

MORRISSEY: No. It was beautiful, but it’s gone. My pride is with Low In High School, World Peace Is None Of Your Business, Years Of Refusal, Ringleader Of the Tormentors, You Are The Quarry, Swords, Southpaw Grammar, Your Arsenal, Vauxhall and I … they are me, whereas The Smiths was a great but simplistic time. I cannot imagine my life without those solo albums, yes, and even Maladjusted ! I love them so much.

JOHN: You didn’t mention Viva Hate or Kill Uncle ?

MORRISSEY: I wasn’t ready. I rushed in too quickly. It was my fault.

JOHN: Your solo musicians receive no support from the press.

MORRISSEY: Last year I did an interview with The Times newspaper and the piece emerged with an enormous photograph of The Smiths … who weren’t even mentioned in the conversation! I must live with it. There can never be enough detail to look beyond The Smiths, or to write a headline that wasn’t a Smiths song. I don’t think it’s a hateful gesture to keep pulling me back to 1983, but there’s certainly a morbid sentimentality. It’s a bit like referring to David Bowie only in relation to The Laughing Gnome.

JOHN: You didn’t seem to mourn the death of David Bowie?

MORRISSEY: Oh. What was I supposed to do?

JOHN: People associate you with one another, yet I’m not sure why.

MORRISSEY: I am surprised that people whose entire life has been the music industry manage to live as long as they do. There’s something mentally crushing about persistently placing yourself before people for their approval. As a matter of fact, I absolutely love to sing. You’d never guess, would you?

JOHN: Your last album was dedicated to Dick Gregory, yet a question of racism has always chased you through the press.

MORRISSEY: People accuse, yes, but they can’t penetrate or illuminate. The sole point of all of those NME slurs was to turn my audience against me. I recall one NME piece many years ago which addressed its readers with ”we just can’t turn you off him, can we ?”. That said it all. And as far as racism goes, the modern Loony Left seem to forget that Hitler was Left wing! But of course, we are all called racist now, and the word is actually meaningless. It’s just a way of changing the subject. When someone calls you racist, what they are saying is ”hmm, you actually have a point, and I don’t know how to answer it, so perhaps if I distract you by calling you a bigot we’ll both forget how enlightened your comment was.”

JOHN: What are your thoughts on the upcoming UK elections?

MORRISSEY: They are local elections but people use their vote with national party figures in mind. UKIP is dead, and Nigel Farage aided their downfall by supporting Henry Bolton. Theresa May was always a Prime Minister uninvited. She is incapable of leadership. She cannot say her own name unless it’s written down on a cue card in front of her. I recall her speech on Eid al-Adhar, and how she referred to it as a ”joyous celebration” … as millions of animals had their throats slit to mark the occasion. I wondered what kind of compassion she could possibly have. The answer is none. However, the Conservatives conserve nothing in modern Britain. In fact, they are the prime destructors of British heritage. Labour are no different from the Conservatives in that they do not object to FGM, halal slaughter, child marriage, and so on. There is no moral clarity with these people, and you shouldn’t vote in a certain way simply because you always have. Do you have the nerve to vote differently? If you have any concern for animal welfare, for example, you cannot possibly vote for either Conservatives or Labour, because both parties support halal slaughter, which, as we all know, is evil. Furthermore, halal slaughter requires certification that can only be given by supporters of ISIS, and yet in England we have halal meat served in hospitals and schools! UKlaw is pointless!

(images below of halal slaughter: the animal bleeds to death very slowly).
[not pictured]

JOHN: Will animal abuse ever stop?

MORRISSEY: Yes. Walk into any major supermarket and you will see how cow’s milk has shrank into to a small corner whilst alternative milks have taken over. Even people who don’t care about animal welfare would rather have rice, oat or cashew milk. The same has happened to eggs. It’s very difficult to locate them now in a supermarket. Obviously I wouldn’t ever buy eggs, but it’s worth taking note of these things.

JOHN: But halal is done in the name of religion.

MORRISSEY: Most murder is! But animals rights must come before religion. Religion must cease to be the ONLY word. I am not interested in what people did ten thousand years ago. I am concerned about what is happening today.

JOHN: Kosher is also very cruel.

MORRISSEY: Very. It, too, must be banned. I am not saying that stunned slaughter is acceptable, because it couldn’t ever be. If you use the term ‘humane slaughter’ then you might as well talk in terms of ‘humane rape’.
People sound very stupid when they mention ‘humane slaughter’.

JOHN: A lot of people can’t afford a vegan diet.

MORRISSEY: I think the point is that we cease to put ourselves first. It is not about what we frivolously want. Every animal even during slaughter fights and kicks until its very last breath. It has one instinct and that is to survive. I stopped watching television because of animal death commercials. I couldn’t allow that into my living space for one more day. I feel liberated without it. They won’t show cigarette commercials but it’s OK to show butchered lambs? And to laugh about it?

JOHN: Don’t you ever wonder if your views have held your career back?

MORRISSEY: Nothing I say is provocative. They are just facts.

JOHN: You say you have never known a British political party that represents your views.

MORRISSEY: There is a new party called For Britain. They have the best approach to animal welfare, whereas no other party even bothers to mention animal welfare. The EU will not protect animals from halal or kosher practice. For Britain seem to say what many British people are currently thinking, which is why the BBC or Channel 4 News will not acknowledge them, because, well, For Britain would change British politics forever … and we can’t have that! If you love animals, you really cannot vote Labour or Conservative. Give animals a break. They’ve done enough for you. Let them live.

JOHN: Your recent tour was magnificent. You seemed very happy.

MORRISSEY: I am!

JOHN: What about a new album?

MORRISSEY: It is under way.

JOHN: Some people objected to your new song Israel.

MORRISSEY: Most did not. It doesn’t do to constantly consider the feelings of those who are determined to hate you eternally. I’m not here for them.

JOHN: The music is much stronger than I can ever remember. I couldn’t imagine The Smiths being so varied or so powerful.

MORRISSEY: The Smiths were explosive during the Rank tour. Before that, we were all fumbling about - me, especially. My voice wasn’t great. The music was always solid.

JOHN: I Wish You Lonely and Jacky’s Only Happy When She’s Up On The Stage are your best ever songs. David Bowie was not writing great songs at this period of his career.

MORRISSEY: I’ve said this previously but I don’t think I have the same lyrical concerns as other singers or writers, so it’s difficult to compare. Everyone, I assume, does their best.

JOHN: I Bury The Living is a shocking song because it is a taboo subject - the idea that a solider might enjoy war and killing. As always, the tabloids attacked you for this song.

MORRISSEY: The tabloids would attack me if I reversed global warming. I once made a comment about China and of course The Guardian attacked me, but the next day David Cameron said more or less the same thing about China and The Guardian praised him! So, you see, personal bias is usually at the root.

JOHN: Spent The Day In Bed was a big radio hit. Was this a good feeling? It’s been a long time since I’m Throwing My Arms Around Paris.

MORRISSEY: It’s still an incredible feeling to be driving along and suddenly your song comes on the radio. I actually stop breathing.

JOHN: Will you stay with BMG?

MORRISSEY: Well, they have very high walls. I think they haven’t had it easy with me because the songs are not pop pap and therefore radio isn’t automatically obliging. My career, if it is a career, is measured in minutes.

JOHN: What do you mean?

MORRISSEY: I mean that I can only plan minute by minute. My legs are all I have to hold me up. (laughs)

JOHN: Are you healthy?

MORRISSEY: No. I’d like to play sports and swim and so forth but such places are usually full of people holding iPhones, and of course, before you know it there’s a shot of you on someone’s Facebook clinging to the parallel bars.

JOHN: You had a bad time with Der Speigel newspaper in Germany. I heard the tapes and the interviewer sounded agreeable and happy with you, but then she wrote an ugly piece. What is the point of this, do you think?

MORRISSEY: Genuine hate? Well, I think a lot of writers are genuinely embarrassed to say ”I really enjoy your music, and you are unique and you look great” - this is thought not to be useful journalism. In order to be thought to be a good writer it seems to me that you must bury your subject. This is also true of biography. You must write with no forgiveness about pop artists who probably saved your life at some stage.

JOHN: Low In High School has a boy on the front holding a sign which says AXE THE MONARCHY. Why did you feel the need to say this again?

MORRISSEY: It wasn’t actually my idea! The photograph was a big surprise to me and I momentarily thought it was very funny. We were in a situation where artwork needed to be handed over instantly in order to meet a release deadline. I wish I’d had a bit longer to get it right. Often, as with Southpaw Grammar and World of Morrissey, there isn’t actually a striking photograph of me to go on the cover. Sounds ridiculous, but it’s true.

JOHN: What is your favourite sleeve, and worst favourite?

MORRISSEY: I didn’t ever like the original Kill Uncle or Southpaw Grammar, or Maladjusted - which was the worst. My favourite is the Greatest Hits image. People think I meticulously design the album sleeves myself, but I don’t.

JOHN: With your views on the monarchy, why did you recently play The Royal Albert Hall, Alexandra Palace and even The London Palladium? Your mother was in the Royal Box, apparently?

MORRISSEY: Yes, my mother, whose name is also Elizabeth, was in the Royal Box. I think those halls belong to all of us. I also think you are asking me if I have softened towards monarchy?

JOHN: No, but, you’ve asked yourself, so go ahead!

MORRISSEY: Well, you know, even a passion to save the planet can start to tire out a bit. I am not fiendish where the House of Windsor is concerned. I resent being ordered to be in awe. I resent the assumption that I must be relentlessly engaged in being in awe of power and money. The House of Windsor represents the strictest social inequality, but I have, I think, expressed my opinion many times, and I don’t feel the need to go on about it, and I wish no ill to anyone. I have been invited to Buckingham Palace three times, did you know? Charles once sent a signed note. If I get a fourth invitation I will go. It seems rude not to! (laughs) I am certain I could persuade Anne that eating horses isn’t a nice thing to do.

JOHN: But you persist with animal welfare?

MORRISSEY: Because animals have no voice. If animals spoke English then no one would eat them. You see, racism is at its most abhorrent in relation to eating animals. If you eat animals, isn’t it a display of hatred for a certain species? And what gives you the right to eat another species or race? Would you eat people from Sri Lanka?

JOHN: In The Bullfighter Dies you are happy because the bullfighter has been killed by the bull.

MORRISSEY: I am applauding the bull. From every angle the torture of the bull is staged. The bullfighter is a spectacular failure who cannot actually fight the bull without a mass of weapons and a host of helpers, whereas the bull stands alone. No one can possibly believe that this is sport. They say ’oh, but it is tradition’, well, yes, but murder has a long tradition in Spain, should we celebrate that, also? A Murder Festival?

JOHN: London has become a murder capital recently.

MORRISSEY: London is debased. The Mayor of London tells us about ”Neighborhood policin ” - what is ‘policin’? He tells us London is an ”amazin ” city. What is ‘amazin’? This is the Mayor of London! And he cannot talk properly! I saw an interview where he was discussing mental health, and he repeatedly said ”men’el ” … he could not say the words ‘mental health’. The Mayor of London! Civilisation is over!

JOHN: But why do you think so many people are being killed in London?

MORRISSEY: London is second only to Bangladesh for acid attacks. All of the attacks are non-white, and so they cannot be truthfully addressed by the British government or the Met Police or the BBC because of political correctness. What this means is that the perpetrator is considered to be as much of a victim as the actual victim. We live in the Age of Atrocity.

JOHN: Since you have so much to say on many subjects, why do you not appear on television interviews?

MORRISSEY: Haven’t you heard of people like Cathy Newman or Jo Coburn? They don’t discuss, they insult. If all fails they’ll conclude the interview by calling your grandmother a fat slob. Diverse opinion is banned in England, debate is over. The most offensive thing you can do in modern Britain is to have an opinion and to talk clearly.

JOHN: How can we be saved?

MORRISSEY: Music is your only friend.

JOHN: When will you play more concerts?

MORRISSEY: I believe Austria and Finland are on course for July.

JOHN: Thank you, and most especially for World Peace Is None Of Your Business.

The interview motherlode!
Regards,
FWD.

Initial source for update:
20180416_180358.jpg



Posted by Harsh Truth:

Interview is credited as follows:

© John Riggers / Alamist, Morrissey Fans Of Portugal (publication September 2018)
Special thanks to Morrissey for this interview, and also to Christian Berret, and to Mariella.
Please do not reproduce interview without permission, John Riggers care of www.morrisseycentral.com.
Also thank you to Sam Esty Rayner.
Photograph of Gustavo Manzur’s two daughters Rigel and Kia taken by Gustavo Manzur, 2017.
Layout and design by Mariella.


Media coverage:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, well, well, the plot thickens. Morrissey has just released a statement regarding the controversial Johnny Riggers interview.


From The Sycophant.co.uk

British pop star Morrissey has harsh words for interview he gave to himself.


"It has come to my attention that yet another fake news terrorist (who, by the way is worse than ISIS) has taken aim at my unquestionable grasp of truth. It has been decided that not enough of my blood has been spilt in the media abattoir’s name, and they will not, NO, they cannot be sated. The leeches must go on removing (it’s from one of my songs).

In this instance, the hooded hangman goes by the name “Johnny Riggers“ who, by the way, is me (Get it? Riggers? Rigged interview. Ha!).

As my eyes ran their usual dreaded laps across the screen, I once again felt my typical knee-jerk defensiveness about my own values, and understanding of the world around me. Still, I was strangely unsurprised by the familiar manner in which my own words are framed, and intentionally misconstrued by me.

Absorbing the contents of this interview, was, I can assure you, far more wrenching than carrying a black child through a saloon in the Jim Crow era South.

It was like listening to a foreign accent in London (the rape capital of both the Earth, and Mars), and can’t helping but wonder how much long your head will remain attached to your body.

Actually, you could compare it to watching someone eat a hamburger and thinking that their child would probably taste better.

No, scratch that, I would say it was more like having Harvey Weinstein sit on your sister’s face while she's sleeping, knowing it’s wrong, but not understanding what all the fuss is about?

In reality, it’s probably closer to all of those things rolled into one.

I sat, back stiffened, along with my resolve, and read words attributed to me that I know I did not say, and even if I did say them, I know I did not mean them, or at least, I never meant to say them out loud. You get the idea.

What does this all mean? Oh, nothing, except that civilization is dead, childhood is evil, and I have no idea what I’m talking about most of the time, so, go easy on me."
 
I actually agree with your points about Sweden and Berlin rape statistics, they are over inflated but to try and deny situations like the Rotherham grooming gangs, Rinkeby no-go zones or the Cologne New Year's Eve sexual assaults took place is also disingenuous at best. In order to have a balanced discussion about these matters it's not a case of 'all muslims are bad' nor 'there are zero problems with islamic immigration into Europe.' The truth lies somewhere in between.

Halal sucks as a form of animal cruelty and i noticed he agreed that kosher should be banned as well.

To top it off you then go and site Snopes which is no better than someone on the right referencing InfoWars. Snopes is leftist junk, right up there with Alexa! :lbf::lbf:

I must admit I do have a soft spot for Alex Jones though, he is one of the great performance artists of his time. God i'd love to him and Cenk Uygur debate, it would be all time hilarious. I know most will have seen this but the few that haven't, this is the funniest thing I have seen in long time.


The fact that you said you like Alex Jones, a man whose lawyer admitted in court was playing a character playing a character, is all I need to know. Jones in a meaningful debate? No.

Infowars started the pizza gate conspiracy that almost got someone killed. The amount of tin foil hattery he has ginned up is monumental. He's not serious.

Morrissey has some nutty fans, and the U.K. seems to be filled with just as many nuts as the U.S. What a sad end to two empires. Old, demented, and an easy lay.
 
Morrissey stopped shocking me years ago. Even as far back as the Smiths. It surprises me that people still read his interviews in the hope he'll 'redeem' himself and then get pissed off when he doesn't. Perhaps I'm shallow, but it's the idea of Morrissey that has always appealed to me more than Morrissey himself, who I find boring.
Morrissey always came across to me as an eccentric elderly woman, who never leaves the house, reads the Daily Mail, and put her cat in her will.
 
My city in the USA does indeed have unreasonably strict and confusing knife laws from my Loony Left local government. These laws don't much impact me, and I often break them, but they help police arrest people they are out to get, or tack on higher level charges when they really don't like someone. Do you approve of helping police do this to people of lower socio-economic backgrounds?
I'm sure you can guess which people are more likely to be frisked for knives. And you can guess which people who think they're carrying a pocket knife in total compliance will be told otherwise by a cop who scrutinizes the knife for any pretext to declare it illegal.

Anyway, here's what the London Mayor said: "No excuses: there is never a reason to carry a knife. Anyone who does will be caught, and they will feel the full force of the law."
NEVER a reason to carry a knife? I've been carrying knives since I was 13. As do millions around the world, as a pocket knife is one of the most useful things to carry. Which is why the law in the UK still allows some types of pocket knives.
But the Mayor won't hear it. NO EXCUSES. ANYONE with a knife, in his view, should be turned into a criminal and feel the full force of the law come down upon them.
And there is even a wacko politician running around the UK who wants to ban pointy-tipped kitchen knives. LOL
It's not the knives that are the problem.

And you're wrong: Most people in urban areas who carry knives are NOT up to anything criminal at all. They carry knives to cut their apple at work, or open packages, or any of the other endless uses.

You are allowed to carry silverware. There are restrictions on knife types, and utility knives.

You sound like a paranoid bumpkin.

Anyway, I seriously doubt sensible people in the U.K> care that much about knive laws in a bustling metropolitan city. It's certainly nothing anyone should be voting on as a single issue.
 
The whole lot looks scripted. I'd say it was an inside job so he could spout his Hitler bollocks, because no one else will have it.
I actually tend to agree. Or at the very least it’s...odd. They should’ve at the very least created a coordinating fake Twitter page for Mr. Riggers, you know, so he could say what an honor it was to interview Moz! ;)
 
I saw this on the Mayor of London's Twitter the other day:
"No excuses: there is never a reason to carry a knife. Anyone who does will be caught, and they will feel the full force of the law."

How can people put up with such stupidity?

Khan seems to be making up his own laws. Knives which do not lock into position and have a blade length of three inches or less are legal to carry on your person in the UK. He’s either suggesting that will not be the case, something which would need a change in legislation at a national level, or he’s so poorly informed he is unable to issue a statement which reflects the law of the land.

There was another knife murder in London last night. A companion piece to the two knife murders the day before. This follows a quiet couple of days where those stabbed have so far survived.

Morrissey, like all who stand on a stage and shout “look at me”, has a need for attention. I’ve never bought the whole “I’m shy unless I’m on stage” stuff from any of the entertainers who have claimed it down the years. To hear him seem to take a different tone with the Monarchy is particularly interesting.

Is it possible that as he and his fans age he has realised he needs to better reflect their values? I’d suggest most aren’t ardent fans of the House of Windsor, but don’t care enough to get exercised by it. I imagine that, like me, many are already making plans to try to avoid the impending Royal Wedding, for example.
 
Last edited:
God, it's bizarre that people are upset about the Hitler starting off as being left-wing comment. It's a perfectly valid opinion. History is a debate about the past. Was Stalin left-wing? Were the Khmer Rouge left-wing? Much evil has been carried out by tyrants on both left and right of politics. I think the point is that left-wing, right-wing, forget the labels and think for yourself. Although I realise that - thanks to social media - that is no longer allowed. #social media is creating a world of human lemmings
 
There have been times where I haven’t supported Morrissey, like his attack on Davis tseng. But I support Britain for the British. Just say no to Islam. Not here
 
Khan seems to be making up his own laws. Knives which do not lock into position and have a blade length of three inches or less are legal to carry on your person in the UK. He’s either suggesting that will not be the case, something which would need a change in legislation at a national level, or he’s so poorly informed he is unable to issue a statement which reflects the law of the land.

Yeah, I knew that because I'm a knife collector and some of the knife companies (like Spyderco) design models to comply with the specific laws of various countries (or cities).
I just found it a ridiculous thing for the Mayor to say, and revealing of his mentality. I've seen some pretty ridiculous things he's said about free speech, too.
 
Islam isn't a religion.
Islam isn't a race.
It is a political ideology.
It is also one of the top threats western culture faces (if the others could be climate change, putin, and trump).
This is why we need to be moving the conversation away from the first two, because liberals get hung up and think the discussion is all about defending brown people, and end up instead defending the most illiberal philosophy every invented.
Islam is a way of running a society at a political level, the government and judiciary, and forcing that upon it's subjects. THAT is a political system. Akin most closely to fascism and nazism.
Which is why it would be hilariously funny, if it wasn't dangerously tragic that liberals are so quick to defend its followers.
Morrissey, is thankfully among famous people, willing to begin to address this elephant in the room. Mainly due I think to his love of animals (religion is notorious in promoting our 'right' to have dominion over the animals and the world), and his dislike of England's culture being wiped away.
Both seemingly sensible and sane positions.

I actually think the danger is... if liberals/the left move far away from positions of sanity (by doing things like bringing a million muslims to Europe and putting their own citizens and culture at risk) then THAT opens the door to extreme right wing parties, because the left's policies have moved so far from centralist views. Then the danger becomes those right wing parties doing bad things (and it's happened before in Europe-not just ww2). But morrissey is right, once freedom of speech is blocked, that is dangerous. Being able to have the conversation is vital.



A slippery slope covered in razor blades.

All you have to get away with having a set of ideas as bad as Islam is make sure you have a few hundred million somewhat behave themselves while the tens of millions can do the work they really want to do. Do these extreme leftists know who this f***ing idiot Muhammad actually was and how he started this cancerous movement?
 
I know this thread is so much better having Skinny on ignore because I can only imagine what David’s attack dog is going for.

That said, man there’s bits of that interview I struggle with. I seriously think he generally has his heart in the right spot but really struggles with some concepts of empathy. Like, not truly understanding how being so black and white on things effect those caught in the middle. He’ll fixate on one part of an issue, eg Brexit, he likes British national identity, fair enough - but he completely ignores the nuanced issues involved. I would love people who interview him to make him think a bit deeper about some of these things. Ask him what he thinks about the debacle Brexit would cause in Ireland/Northern Ireland. He latches onto a particular aspect of an issue and it’s like he’s blinded to everything else, good or bad, in order to drill in on that tunnel vision view of the thing he’s into. Issues are more complex than that, Moz.
And at the same time, people are complex, people demonising him as basically the devil are doing something similar to what he’s doing. They’re letting their bias get in the way, totally focused on one thing (Morrissey = bad). And fail to realise how complex we actually are as people. And if you truly think he’s bad, why not just leave and do something more productive with your time?

That being said, the bit that stood out to me was new music underway...hooray!
 
Khan seems to be making up his own laws. Knives which do not lock into position and have a blade length of three inches or less are legal to carry on your person in the UK. He’s either suggesting that will not be the case, something which would need a change in legislation at a national level, or he’s so poorly informed he is unable to issue a statement which reflects the law of the land.

There was another knife murder in London last night. A companion piece to the two knife murders the day before. This follows a quiet couple of days where those stabbed have so far survived.

Morrissey, like all who stand on a stage and shout “look at me”, has a need for attention. I’ve never bought the whole “I’m shy unless I’m on stage” stuff from any of the entertainers who have claimed it down the years. To hear him seem to take a different tone with the Monarchy is particularly interesting.

Is it possible that as he and his fans age he has realised he needs to better reflect their values? I’d suggest most aren’t ardent fans of the House of Windsor, but don’t care enough to get exercised by it. I imagine that, like me, many are already making plans to try to avoid the impending Royal Wedding, for example.
I have said that before. You've seen it from other entertainers over the years who no longer have the ear of the youth adjust their message for an aging audience, but Morrissey has always hinted at these biases in numerous ways. England started changing dramatically during his youth.

I'm sure a portion of it is the usual aged resentment towards changing standards, and values, but having known that this strategy is intentionally used by some live performers to keep themselves afloat makes me incredibly cynical about it.

The reality is, the world changes significantly within the average person's lifetime, and for many people it's difficult to cope with as they age, and they begin to feel more removed from the culture, and its practices. The retreat to tribal thinking that make them feel more connected to a relevant group, and time.

They feel threatened by things the youth don't feel threatened by because the youth are more closely involved in those trends, and they tend to have a more diverse set of peers. As people grow older, they tend to have fewer friends, and experience greater isolation. Isolation always leads to paranoia. Echo chamber thinking takes hold, and they are constantly told they should be fearful about this or that.

The things I heard in the eighties from people who were absolutely shocked that you could no longer say the word "n*****" in polite company is but one example of this disconnect. It was as if you took away part of their being over a word that dehumanized a group of people. They couldn't comprehend the reasoning They saw nothing wrong. It was like calling a door, a door. What's the issue?

The more isolated people are, the more bigoted they tend to be.

I often wonder what Damon's views are, and how they influence Morrissey's. After all, this is a man who pretended to like boxing while living with a boxing enthusiast. One wonders.
 
Listen, I support David and I met him in Oklahoma all those years ago. I basically admitted that he has kept Morrissey career going with this site. I support him with his ordeal with Morrissey. I think Morrissey is probably a hard to deal with person. But i respect the f*** out of Morrissey for standing up for the truth and not shutting his mouth because the liberals say you can’t critize Islam. Good for Morrissey.
 
In the interests of adding a bit of balance to all this knicker-wetting hysteria, I would like to suggest that he is right on at least two issues: firstly the EU do hate us and their contemptuous behaviour since the Leave vote has been positively Putinesque. Secondly, Diane Abbott deserves all the ridicule she gets for being an incompetent buffoon, and anyone who wants to turn that into an argument about race is worryingly deluded.

As for the rest of it, the For Britain and Khan stuff is certainly unsavoury but the most troubling issue for me was that he sounds utterly ignorant. I like contentious views that stir the pot and make me think, and if people have a cogent argument I'll at least listen, but there's no intellect here: just an old man rambling in the corner.

Take all that flaky polemic away and we're left with an 'interview' in which he tells us "Well, I think a lot of writers are genuinely embarrassed to say ”I really enjoy your music, and you are unique and you look great” and congratulates himself on his shitty last album. It's the narcissism that should worry us, even more than the racism, because then he truly will just disappear up his own fundament.
 
I know this thread is so much better having Skinny on ignore because I can only imagine what David’s attack dog is going for.

That said, man there’s bits of that interview I struggle with. I seriously think he generally has his heart in the right spot but really struggles with some concepts of empathy. Like, not truly understanding how being so black and white on things effect those caught in the middle. He’ll fixate on one part of an issue, eg Brexit, he likes British national identity, fair enough - but he completely ignores the nuanced issues involved. I would love people who interview him to make him think a bit deeper about some of these things. Ask him what he thinks about the debacle Brexit would cause in Ireland/Northern Ireland. He latches onto a particular aspect of an issue and it’s like he’s blinded to everything else, good or bad, in order to drill in on that tunnel vision view of the thing he’s into. Issues are more complex than that, Moz.
And at the same time, people are complex, people demonising him as basically the devil are doing something similar to what he’s doing. They’re letting their bias get in the way, totally focused on one thing (Morrissey = bad). And fail to realise how complex we actually are as people. And if you truly think he’s bad, why not just leave and do something more productive with your time?

That being said, the bit that stood out to me was new music underway...hooray!
I agree with most of your thoughts. Still, you have to understand that to people who are media hounds, follow politics, and earnestly seek to validate various claims, the fact that he is making statements about already debunked rape capital statistics, and fabricating things certain publications said about him, places him outside the realm of honest, but clumsy. It places him in the realm of intentionally enabling bigotry toward large groups of people based on false information. It's an important distinction.

You can't rail against fake news as you post fake news. He knows what he's doing.

He knows he lied about the Der Spiegel interview which he treats with kid gloves now. Again, he lied about the interviewer posting his exact comments.

This goes beyond Morrissey wanting reductions in immigration. In fact, he's never detailed exactly what he wants done in regards to immigration, and instead he has lumped entire groups of people together; as have many posters on here. They are removed from the dread this causes those people because it's not them, or their friends and family. It's a theoretical person that they have no attachment to.

These are the points that rub many observers the wrong way. It goes from concern over his political priorities to concern over him actually promoting harmful conspiracies that can have real impact on people's lives. It comes across as bullying. Morrissey has a tendency to bully.

It enables those with broader political visions to enact their agenda, while treating a single, shared issue as more important than that.

When a person seems almost entirely interested in something like immigrants, expect there to be suspicion.
 
Islam isn't a religion.
Islam isn't a race.
It is a political ideology.
It is also one of the top threats western culture faces (if the others could be climate change, putin, and trump).
This is why we need to be moving the conversation away from the first two, because liberals get hung up and think the discussion is all about defending brown people, and end up instead defending the most illiberal philosophy every invented.
Islam is a way of running a society at a political level, the government and judiciary, and forcing that upon it's subjects. THAT is a political system. Akin most closely to fascism and nazism.
Which is why it would be hilariously funny, if it wasn't dangerously tragic that liberals are so quick to defend its followers.
Morrissey, is thankfully among famous people, willing to begin to address this elephant in the room. Mainly due I think to his love of animals (religion is notorious in promoting our 'right' to have dominion over the animals and the world), and his dislike of England's culture being wiped away.
Both seemingly sensible and sane positions.

I actually think the danger is... if liberals/the left move far away from positions of sanity (by doing things like bringing a million muslims to Europe and putting their own citizens and culture at risk) then THAT opens the door to extreme right wing parties, because the left's policies have moved so far from centralist views. Then the danger becomes those right wing parties doing bad things (and it's happened before in Europe-not just ww2). But morrissey is right, once freedom of speech is blocked, that is dangerous. Being able to have the conversation is vital.
The left aren't bringing millions of Muslims to the U.K. Both the right, and left have agreed to house migrants form various regions, and it's not going to change. You're acting like liberals are demanding open borders, and unlimited migrants, and they're not. They're demanding less hysteria.

Finally, Islam is absolutely a religion, and it worships the same God as Christian, and Jews do. They are all Abrahamic religions. Islam is not any more political than Christianity, or Judaism. Christians have treated Jews, and Muslims like shit throughout history. Colonization has exacerbated these rivalries, and Christians are largely responsible for that. As long as we allow religion to exist, it's important to not let each bully the other, and use it to fuel broader political goals that have little to do with religion.

Again, Islam, Christianity, and Judaism are all related. They share different prophets, as do Mormons.

What you are witnessing in global politics is the effects of Great Britain's interest in expanding its empire. It now wants both the benefits of isolation, and expansion, and that's pretty much impossible.
 
In the interests of adding a bit of balance to all this knicker-wetting hysteria, I would like to suggest that he is right on at least two issues: firstly the EU do hate us and their contemptuous behaviour since the Leave vote has been positively Putinesque. Secondly, Diane Abbott deserves all the ridicule she gets for being an incompetent buffoon, and anyone who wants to turn that into an argument about race is worryingly deluded.

As for the rest of it, the For Britain and Khan stuff is certainly unsavoury but the most troubling issue for me was that he sounds utterly ignorant. I like contentious views that stir the pot and make me think, and if people have a cogent argument I'll at least listen, but there's no intellect here: just an old man rambling in the corner.

Take all that flaky polemic away and we're left with an 'interview' in which he tells us "Well, I think a lot of writers are genuinely embarrassed to say ”I really enjoy your music, and you are unique and you look great” and congratulates himself on his shitty last album. It's the narcissism that should worry us, even more than the racism, because then he truly will just disappear up his own fundament.

Agree with a lot of that except Khan. He is awful. The way he speaks is ridiculous. The mumbling, the trying to sound streetwise by dropping his t's. And he has been a rubbish mayor. I couldn't stand Johnson but Khan is almost as bad. He's achieved hardly anything.
 
Some interesting stuff among the muddled politics:
  • Prince Charles has communicated with him
  • He's eased off his hatred of the Royal Family
  • He's realised that the LIHS cover is pretty awful (don't know we can believe him that it wasn't his idea)
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom