The Guardian: "‘An astounding rush of real-time creativity’: 40 years of the Smiths’ Peel Sessions" by Michael Hann (May 31, 2023)

The Guardian has a new article by Michael Hann, celebrating the power of the first Smiths radio sessions.

Not everyone finds it easy to listen to the Smiths now, but those early transmissions were utterly formative for this vital new band and their enraptured fans

full


Full text below:

It’s 40 years this month since anyone bar the attenders at their handful of gigs heard the Smiths. On 13 May 1983, they released their first single, Hand in Glove, on Rough Trade. Then, on 31 May, John Peel broadcast their first session for his BBC Radio 1 show. Before the year was out, they would have recorded one more for him, as well as two for David Jensen. A total of 14 songs were broadcast, all being heard for the first time, apart from a new version of Handsome Devil, the B-side to Hand in Glove.

The Smiths’ radio sessions were as astounding a rush of real-time creativity as pop has witnessed. When they released their first album the following year, only two of its 10 tracks had not previously been recorded for Radio 1. It was those sessions that built up their following so rapidly and so rabidly.

The late David Cavanagh wrote of the sessions, in his Peel biography Good Night and Good Riddance, that they “have given the Smiths so much momentum that an album is almost superfluous. There’s no question that the momentum began with Peel. The Smiths’ universe is at odds with almost everything happening on a cultural or commercial level in Britain’s 80s, and Peel is the arbiter of taste in the alternative society.” (The truth of that was proved by the utter lack of success of another hugely idiosyncratic but gorgeously melodic provincial indie band with an eccentric singer – Peel did not care for Felt and their career went nowhere.)

I didn’t hear Hand in Glove when it was released because I wasn’t yet listening to night-time Radio 1. A few weeks later though, I was: I had noticed that there were often heavy metal bands on Top of the Pops when Peel presented it and I wondered whether he might play any of it on the radio. (I was 13 and fondly imagined that the presenters picked at least some of the acts for Top of the Pops.) He didn’t – not at that point in time, anyway – but on one of the first shows I listened to I heard a repeat of that first Smiths session. I had never heard music that sounded like that before, and I had never heard a singer whose words – in any way at all – actually reflected my life, as a bullied, lonely kid who had no idea how to navigate the world safely, let alone confidently.

Of course, countless kids around the country responded the same way as I did. I wasn’t allowed to stay up until midnight, when Peel finished, so I would go to bed and turn the light off, then plug the headphones into the radio-cassette recorder. I had a handful of C90s that I filled with Peel sessions, one finger poised over the pause button. But it was only with the Smiths’ sessions that I would diligently transcribe the lyrics when I came home from school the next day.

And the songs! Those strange and beautiful songs. Peel described them as “a band with no obvious influences whatsoever”. Well, this is true and yet it’s false. The Smiths sounded like nothing because they sounded like so much: Marr brought Motown and the Stooges and the Patti Smith Group and Bert Jansch and Buffalo Springfield and so many more things into his writing, but because the juxtapositions were so unexpected, they went unheard, and because the influences were filtered through his playing (“fractured yet fluid”, I recall Morrissey calling it in an early interview with Sounds), the Smiths sounded only like the Smiths.

Sometimes the Smiths evolved from their sessions, and sometimes they went backwards. Reel Around the Fountain was one of the latter cases. Recorded for the first Peel session, it was a grave and stately thing, with Marr’s spectral and sparse guitar-playing draped over the song like gauze. A couple of months later they recorded it for Jensen (though this version was not broadcast for two years owing to a tabloid claim that it was a paedophile anthem), and there are acoustic guitars drowning out those spidery lead lines. The following year, on their self-titled debut album, the bassline had changed and it was no longer a strange, misty message from the ether, but a wholly conventional country-pop song. Shame.

This Charming Man, recorded for the second Peel session, underwent the reverse process. Marr wrote the track specifically for the session, trying to create something reminiscent of Rough Trade labelmates Aztec Camera, but with the bass rhythm of the Supremes’ You Can’t Hurry Love (and, of course, it ended up sounding like neither). But that version of This Charming Man is an unopened flower compared to the version released as a single just a few weeks later. For the single version, producer John Porter advised them to change the rhythm from that Motown bounce to a stricter, more rigid style, which foregrounded Andy Rourke’s brilliant bassline, and to introduce the sudden pauses that give the song drama. That’s how fleet-footed the Smiths were at this point: from sketch to one of the decade’s great singles in weeks.

And there were the songs that got away – the sternly empathic This Night Has Opened My Eyes, one of Morrissey’s Shelagh Delaney homages, which was never recorded for Rough Trade. “In a river the colour of lead / Immerse the baby’s head,” he sang, prompting producer Roger Pusey to stop the session to check he wasn’t about to record a song celebrating the drowning of infants.

Each of these songs arrived a few weeks apart. The Smiths were, truly, a teenage semaphore, sending out messages of hope: you are not alone. (Morrissey later remembered how Accept Yourself, recorded for Jensen, prompted a rash of letters from fans thanking him for telling them they were fine as they were). In the conflict zone that is adolescence, the songs were comfort packages. And you could get these joys simply by tuning into Radio 1 of an evening.

I rarely listen to the Smiths these days. I know the songs too well. And too many of them have been coloured by the current views of their singer. But every so often I am taken on the time machine again. In autumn of 2021, I saw Rick Astley singing the songs of the Smiths with the Stockport band Blossoms. My friends and I had thought we would be at the centre of the demographic. In fact, we were among the older people there. The teenage semaphore never stopped communicating. The miracle of the Smiths is too profound to ever truly be overshadowed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So they keep telling me & I keep finding their homophobic articles & stories about how homophobic Indie music is.

This is from the Guardian a year after the NME's Madstock hit piece:

FIFTEEN years after Tom Robinson announced that he was 'glad to be gay', homosexuality is still a stigma in the music business. Despite the large number of gay people working behind the scenes in the industry, gay pop stars are still discouraged from being open about their sexual orientation.
Even now, just the suggestion of homosexuality is thought to have a negative impact on record sales. When, two years ago, The Face magazine published a photo of a T-shirt imprinted with Jason Donovan's face and the words 'Queer as f***', the teen idol immediately sued for libel (and won). Moreover, Tom Robinson, one of the few crusading gay stars, has taken refuge in marriage (to a woman) and fatherhood. The number of stars who are openly gay can still be counted on the fingers of one hand: Elton John, Boy George, Mark Almond, Jimmy Sommerville and kd lang. Others, such as the Pet Shop Boys and Right Said Fred, may camp it up but have never publicly announced a sexual preference. Sommerville excepted, these people, along with seventies disco preeners The Village People and the late Freddie Mercury are accepted by the business as colourful eccentrics rather than as gay men and women. They've been allowed to be homosexual as long as their benign with it.

(Caroline Sullivan, the Guardian, 17 December 1993)
That last sentence is a big part of it. Other gay artists don't get attacked like this, but other gay artists are harmless. Morrissey on the other hand, just look at the first Smiths single. And Suffer Little Children, Reel Around the Fountain, Panic. Meat is Murder. He is and has always been controversial and outspoken so the "who does this f*g think he is" feeling arises.

That said I think homophobia is one element rather than the element.
I think gashonthenail also hits the nail on the head that the woke left considers him some kind of apostate. The poster who said people "go for him" because his actions (he means words of course) of recent years contradict the spirit of the Smiths is actually saying the same thing.
 
So they keep telling me & I keep finding their homophobic articles & stories about how homophobic Indie music is.

This is from the Guardian a year after the NME's Madstock hit piece:

FIFTEEN years after Tom Robinson announced that he was 'glad to be gay', homosexuality is still a stigma in the music business. Despite the large number of gay people working behind the scenes in the industry, gay pop stars are still discouraged from being open about their sexual orientation.
Even now, just the suggestion of homosexuality is thought to have a negative impact on record sales. When, two years ago, The Face magazine published a photo of a T-shirt imprinted with Jason Donovan's face and the words 'Queer as f***', the teen idol immediately sued for libel (and won). Moreover, Tom Robinson, one of the few crusading gay stars, has taken refuge in marriage (to a woman) and fatherhood. The number of stars who are openly gay can still be counted on the fingers of one hand: Elton John, Boy George, Mark Almond, Jimmy Sommerville and kd lang. Others, such as the Pet Shop Boys and Right Said Fred, may camp it up but have never publicly announced a sexual preference. Sommerville excepted, these people, along with seventies disco preeners The Village People and the late Freddie Mercury are accepted by the business as colourful eccentrics rather than as gay men and women. They've been allowed to be homosexual as long as their benign with it.

(Caroline Sullivan, the Guardian, 17 December 1993)
What about the Erasure guy? He is super gay! And he had some hits.
 
What about the Erasure guy? He is super gay! And he had some hits.

Read it!! You could be gay if you stayed in your gay lane - what you couldn't do was sing authentic songs about your feelings in the Indie genre & certainly not so beautifully that teenage boys identified with them & stormed the stage to hug & kiss you.
 
Read it!! You could be gay if you stayed in your gay lane - what you couldn't do was sing authentic songs about your feelings in the Indie genre & certainly not so beautifully that teenage boys identified with them & stormed the stage to hug & kiss you.
I've often wondered what the gay community think about Morrissey because he has never supported them and he has never actually said that he is gay. Morrissey is a completely unique case. It's like, is he in the closet but just being coy or is he neither gay nor straight? Somehow everyone, regardless of orientation can relate to his songs. No one in pop, rock music is similar to Morrissey in that respect.
 
That last sentence is a big part of it. Other gay artists don't get attacked like this, but other gay artists are harmless. Morrissey on the other hand, just look at the first Smiths single. And Suffer Little Children, Reel Around the Fountain, Panic. Meat is Murder. He is and has always been controversial and outspoken so the "who does this f*g think he is" feeling arises.

That said I think homophobia is one element rather than the element.
I think gashonthenail also hits the nail on the head that the woke left considers him some kind of apostate. The poster who said people "go for him" because his actions (he means words of course) of recent years contradict the spirit of the Smiths is actually saying the same thing.

Homophobia is 'the' thing - none of the recent stuff matters except that they were delighted because they thought they could retcon it & even if someone busted them on the old lies they could say it didn't matter because he turned out to be a fash anyway.

In 2004 they were bricking it because America Is Not The World was clearly left-wing, Irish Blood made it obvious he was not in fact English - a thing they'd left out of the Madstock article because the far right had been in London that day to attack an Irish Republican march - & All The Lazy Dykes was a terrifying sign he might start talking about being gay which would lead to questions about their 90s coverage.
 
I've often wondered what the gay community think about Morrissey because he has never supported them and he has never actually said that he is gay. Morrissey is a completely unique case. It's like, is he in the closet but just being coy or is he neither gay nor straight? Somehow everyone, regardless of orientation can relate to his songs. No one in pop, rock music is similar to Morrissey in that respect.

From what I've found - he was 'out' in public & private until 1984 when the press got too bothersome & then he was 'out' in private & never claimed to be straight in public.

And the gay press was mad about it - they thought he should speak out - but I think his career would have ended. The phone would have stopped ringing. It happened to other gay Indie artists.
 
From what I've found - he was 'out' in public & private until 1984 when the press got too bothersome & then he was 'out' in private & never claimed to be straight in public.

And the gay press was mad about it - they thought he should speak out - but I think his career would have ended. The phone would have stopped ringing. It happened to other gay Indie artists.
Hence the whole celibacy thing?
 
Yeah. I don't think it was entirely a lie - but it wasn't the whole story. And it seems he either had a boyfriend by 1987 or the press thought he did. That's when they really turn on him.
As a straight man I will say this, and I have been a fan since Meat Is Murder. Morrissey never struck me as being a gay man. He did not fit the stereotypes that I had of gay men. Like other people, gay or straight, I loved his style, his hair (of course), his songs spoke to me, very relatable. He didn't look like what I thought a gay person should look like. He looked like James Dean, who is the epitome of cool. Gay singers to me in the 80's (in my mind) were obviously like Boy George--someone I would not want to look like. By the early 90's Morrissey seemed even less gay. He had filled out physically, had the rockabilly look which is a very straight genre and it is probably no coincidence that he reached his pinnacle from say, 1991 to 1994. He was definitely a sex symbol to women and I think he was marketed that way. Also, Morrissey eschewed the stereotypical gay passions like Madonna, dance music, and whatever else gay people supposedly liked. He instead was a fan of boxing! I think in the back of my mind I may have assumed he was gay but honestly, I really didn't care just like I wouldn't have cared if a friend or family member was gay.
 
I still have enormous respect for Morrissey as a creative artist. He's an enormously talented musical genius. To me that is an established fact. Morrissey the person, however, is a different kettle of fish.
He's an arrogant, entitled popstar who lives in a bubble. He lacks appreciation for important musical collaborators who have massively enriched his life. He doesn't really respect his fans and it shows. Just look at his track record. He can't get along with managers, record companies, or bandmates long-term. He thinks his cranky opinions are important enough to broadcast to the whole world. It's no wonder that some find it hard to listen to him these days.
 
As a straight man I will say this, and I have been a fan since Meat Is Murder. Morrissey never struck me as being a gay man. He did not fit the stereotypes that I had of gay men. Like other people, gay or straight, I loved his style, his hair (of course), his songs spoke to me, very relatable. He didn't look like what I thought a gay person should look like. He looked like James Dean, who is the epitome of cool. Gay singers to me in the 80's (in my mind) were obviously like Boy George--someone I would not want to look like. By the early 90's Morrissey seemed even less gay. He had filled out physically, had the rockabilly look which is a very straight genre and it is probably no coincidence that he reached his pinnacle from say, 1991 to 1994. He was definitely a sex symbol to women and I think he was marketed that way. Also, Morrissey eschewed the stereotypical gay passions like Madonna, dance music, and whatever else gay people supposedly liked. He instead was a fan of boxing! I think in the back of my mind I may have assumed he was gay but honestly, I really didn't care just like I wouldn't have cared if a friend or family member was gay.

I'd always heard that he was gay & I knew a lot of gay men who felt they had to become "straight acting" or no one would fancy them - but it wasn't until I was rummaging around the archives in the Bishopsgate Institute that I realised Morrissey's imagery is very, very gay. Skinheads, rockabilly, James Dean, 1960s film stars, it's all there...

For example (not from the Bishopsgate) - quiffs & skinheads from Canadian gayzine J.D.s., circa 1985 to 1991, which Steve Wells wrote about in the NME. So they knew how filthy this stuff could get:

1181807.jpg


1181817.jpg
 
As a straight man I will say this, and I have been a fan since Meat Is Murder. Morrissey never struck me as being a gay man. He did not fit the stereotypes that I had of gay men. Like other people, gay or straight, I loved his style, his hair (of course), his songs spoke to me, very relatable. He didn't look like what I thought a gay person should look like. He looked like James Dean, who is the epitome of cool. Gay singers to me in the 80's (in my mind) were obviously like Boy George--someone I would not want to look like. By the early 90's Morrissey seemed even less gay. He had filled out physically, had the rockabilly look which is a very straight genre and it is probably no coincidence that he reached his pinnacle from say, 1991 to 1994. He was definitely a sex symbol to women and I think he was marketed that way. Also, Morrissey eschewed the stereotypical gay passions like Madonna, dance music, and whatever else gay people supposedly liked. He instead was a fan of boxing! I think in the back of my mind I may have assumed he was gay but honestly, I really didn't care just like I wouldn't have cared if a friend or family member was gay.

I'm just the opposite. Morrissey always seemed pretty gay to me, even though he didn't fit into any obvious gay stereotype. But when a young Truman Capote in loafers jumping for joy is your single cover, that says something. Plus Morrissey's dancing, though unskilled, had a real flamboyancy to it. I had The Smiths: The Complete Picture and Hulmerist, and if you didn't get a gay vibe from those videos then we must have very different ways of seeing things. Derek Jarman short films, the insane entirety of November Spawned Monster, the effeminate hip-swinging and fluttery dancing, flowers all over the place, Oscar Wilde ... whatever Morrissey was, he was at the very least "non-conforming."
 
I'm just the opposite. Morrissey always seemed pretty gay to me, even though he didn't fit into any obvious gay stereotype. But when a young Truman Capote in loafers jumping for joy is your single cover, that says something. Plus Morrissey's dancing, though unskilled, had a real flamboyancy to it. I had The Smiths: The Complete Picture and Hulmerist, and if you didn't get a gay vibe from those videos then we must have very different ways of seeing things. Derek Jarman short films, the insane entirety of November Spawned Monster, the effeminate hip-swinging and fluttery dancing, flowers all over the place, Oscar Wilde ... whatever Morrissey was, he was at the very least "non-conforming."
My image of a gay rock star would have been more like Freddie Mercury. The short hair, mustache, tank top. The kind of guy you could imagine seeing inside a gay bar dancing to horrible dance music. Morrissey wore the Levi's--I loved when he paired it up with Doc Martens, sports jacket, and had the perfect haircut who despised dance music. All I can say is that if you thought Morrissey "looked" gay, I wanted to look gay too then.
 
I'd always heard that he was gay & I knew a lot of gay men who felt they had to become "straight acting" or no one would fancy them - but it wasn't until I was rummaging around the archives in the Bishopsgate Institute that I realised Morrissey's imagery is very, very gay. Skinheads, rockabilly, James Dean, 1960s film stars, it's all there...

For example (not from the Bishopsgate) - quiffs & skinheads from Canadian gayzine J.D.s., circa 1985 to 1991, which Steve Wells wrote about in the NME. So they knew how filthy this stuff could get:

View attachment 91472

View attachment 91473
Gary Day may have inadvertently attracted some unwanted attention!
 
Those Peel and Jensen Smiths radio sessions...they sound so rich and have a unique, timeless quality. It's truly incredible they were so young as a band at the time these were recorded.

The band deserved way more exposure outside of Europe when they were together, but they left an amazing footprint and there are new discoverers daily and will be forever. I'm beyond grateful for The Smiths.
 
Last edited:
Morrissey is gay. I can understand his reluctance to coming out in the eighties. But we don’t live in the eighties anymore. And these days his whole “humasexual” thing is just a cop-out.
 
I don`t think Morrissey is racist, and I don`t care if he`s gay or refuses to wear a label. I love his music and I always will. I don`t think we have the right to demand someone come out just because they think he owes it to us. I love him no matter how he identifies. I think we do know the truth because his music speaks volumes. We don`t live in the eighties anymore but homophobia still exists.
 
No one is ever sure what Karen / Malarkey means. She clings to the belief that there is some sort of homophobic / right wing conspiracy to paint Morrissey as far right. Because as we know fascists have always loved a camp, effeminate Irish immigrant with a penchant for poetry as their poster boy. She's been subdued of late. Maybe her dealer went dry, or they got her medication right. But she is clearly on the conspiracy trail tonight again.
She's only been subdued on here because she now focuses her relentless, fanatical, never-ending campaign on Twitter instead.
 
As a straight man I will say this, and I have been a fan since Meat Is Murder. Morrissey never struck me as being a gay man. He did not fit the stereotypes that I had of gay men. Like other people, gay or straight, I loved his style, his hair (of course), his songs spoke to me, very relatable. He didn't look like what I thought a gay person should look like. He looked like James Dean, who is the epitome of cool. Gay singers to me in the 80's (in my mind) were obviously like Boy George--someone I would not want to look like. By the early 90's Morrissey seemed even less gay. He had filled out physically, had the rockabilly look which is a very straight genre and it is probably no coincidence that he reached his pinnacle from say, 1991 to 1994. He was definitely a sex symbol to women and I think he was marketed that way. Also, Morrissey eschewed the stereotypical gay passions like Madonna, dance music, and whatever else gay people supposedly liked. He instead was a fan of boxing! I think in the back of my mind I may have assumed he was gay but honestly, I really didn't care just like I wouldn't have cared if a friend or family member was gay.
I think you have described very well why stereotypes are bull shit. James Dean was of course bisexual, and probably preferred men to women. It's all just the weird and wonderful world of human sexuality. There is reproduction and making babies - all the rest is kink.
Moz clearly has never wanted to be labelled. Labels are for tins of beans. Moz is an 'artist', not a 'gay artist'. I so respect him for that. It was a wise decision. Look at what gay liberation has become: LGBTQ+ABC-WXYZ...and as the alphabet soup gets bigger, the gay bars and lesbian bars have all closed down. But the kids still have Sam Smith, the non-binary they/them WC Fields. Whilst trans activists try to stop a lesbian feminist philosopher speaking at the Oxford Union. Now there's the real joke. But maybe not so funny.
 
M is kenneth williams,straight or gay who cares,hes camp as christmas which i like and funny as fook.
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom