Have to be honest I have never ever liked this track.
It seemed like it was played at every Moz gig I ever attended.
So he did. That's really quite recent. I had a look on YouTube and I'm afraid it didn't do anything for me, whereas the music video still looks very fresh to my eyes.He sang it at London Palladium 2018 (?)
My highlight of the entire concert
In response to: "Then there's the whole weird breakdown with the noises of what can only be described as someone severely disabled receiving some sort of sexual pleasure?"This came on in my car the other day, and I realised just how offensive it could seem when picked apart, especially nowadays. It's got a great beat and is one of Morrissey's more 'danceable/poppy/accessible' songs if that's what you're looking for. But as is often the case the music belies the darkness of the lyrics. Let's have a look:
Lines describing someone who's disabled as "twisted", a "monster" who nobody would dream of kissing even in a darkened room. Someone who's a "hostage" to the wheels of their chair, who could never be thought of in a sexual way, they're the point where horny people must "pause and draw the line". Then there's the whole weird breakdown with the noises of what can only be described as someone severely disabled receiving some sort of sexual pleasure? I cringed thinking of a person having to go into a recording booth and make those noises. Like, what did Morrissey or the producer tell them to sound like? What was the aim?
Now, to play devil's advocate: the lyrics are very clever. They're not out to offend, they merely highlight the various ways society views the disabled, and the hypocrisy of those views. It's society who label these people as "poor" (faux sympathy) but also call them "twisted" (secret disgust/bigotry). It's society who remarks behind the person's back that it's such a shame they'll never live "normal" lives, that the nearest they'll get to being loved is only in their dreams.
I don't know, I just think as far as M's lyrics being open to causing offence, this one possibly ranks way higher than the ones that actually DID cause offence, such as National Front Disco. Anyone with a brain can see the latter is just a story of a disaffected boy and the tribulations of his family who think they've 'lost' him. Ah well. Once again maybe I'm over thinking things. But in an age of wider acceptance/understanding around disability (think of the positive way we view paralympians etc) this song can either be seen as shining a light on how 'normal' people still secretly and hypocritically view the differently-abled, or it's just offensive twaddle about how someone in a wheelchair can't do sexual things or buy their own clothes, and I'm over-analysing once again.
I'll let the rest of you decide.
The lyrics go from the second person to the first person and end in the third person - but I always heard 'poor twisted child' as going with 'hug me, hug me', so in other words she is really describing herself. The words we call ourselves are sometimes the worst of all. The imputation is that 'monster' is also a word she maybe uses to describe herself on a low day. But there is clearly something too about the words that society uses to describe disability - at least historically. I never heard the song as somehow being derogatory about disability. And I don't think anyone in a wheelchair would either.This came on in my car the other day, and I realised just how offensive it could seem when picked apart, especially nowadays. It's got a great beat and is one of Morrissey's more 'danceable/poppy/accessible' songs if that's what you're looking for. But as is often the case the music belies the darkness of the lyrics. Let's have a look:
Lines describing someone who's disabled as "twisted", a "monster" who nobody would dream of kissing even in a darkened room. Someone who's a "hostage" to the wheels of their chair, who could never be thought of in a sexual way, they're the point where horny people must "pause and draw the line". Then there's the whole weird breakdown with the noises of what can only be described as someone severely disabled receiving some sort of sexual pleasure? I cringed thinking of a person having to go into a recording booth and make those noises. Like, what did Morrissey or the producer tell them to sound like? What was the aim?
Now, to play devil's advocate: the lyrics are very clever. They're not out to offend, they merely highlight the various ways society views the disabled, and the hypocrisy of those views. It's society who label these people as "poor" (faux sympathy) but also call them "twisted" (secret disgust/bigotry). It's society who remarks behind the person's back that it's such a shame they'll never live "normal" lives, that the nearest they'll get to being loved is only in their dreams.
I don't know, I just think as far as M's lyrics being open to causing offence, this one possibly ranks way higher than the ones that actually DID cause offence, such as National Front Disco. Anyone with a brain can see the latter is just a story of a disaffected boy and the tribulations of his family who think they've 'lost' him. Ah well. Once again maybe I'm over thinking things. But in an age of wider acceptance/understanding around disability (think of the positive way we view paralympians etc) this song can either be seen as shining a light on how 'normal' people still secretly and hypocritically view the differently-abled, or it's just offensive twaddle about how someone in a wheelchair can't do sexual things or buy their own clothes, and I'm over-analysing once again.
I'll let the rest of you decide.
She sounds a little like Jann Arden, but not so mainstream.In response to: "Then there's the whole weird breakdown with the noises of what can only be described as someone severely disabled receiving some sort of sexual pleasure?"
That's the singer Mary Margaret O'Hara, and those kind of noises were very much a part of her act/style. So I don't think Morrissey said to her anything like: "pretend to be severely disabled whilst receiving some sort of sexual pleasure."
Some info about her here:
Cult heroes: Mary Margaret O'Hara – the genius for whom one album was enough
The Canadian’s 1988 debut Miss America is a spellbinding classic. But even as O’Hara returns to public view this year, a long-awaited follow-up looks no closerwww.theguardian.com
It was played to death, especially on the Kill Uncle and Your Arsenal tours. Never really a favorite of mine but I'd take over a song like Paris that gets overplayed now.Have to be honest I have never ever liked this track.
It seemed like it was played at every Moz gig I ever attended.
She sounds a little like Jann Arden, but not so mainstream.
Admittedly it was the first Morrissey single I purchased (on cassette single no less) at the tender age of 15. So always a special place in my heart for this particular tuneSo he did. That's really quite recent. I had a look on YouTube and I'm afraid it didn't do anything for me, whereas the music video still looks very fresh to my eyes.
For me it's a fantastic song, musically and lyrically one of his strongest at the time of release.
I still think it's lyrically one of his strongest, even though his catalogue is much broader now, but I would agree that the music on the recorded studio version is a little out of date. The music isn't going to attract new fans, but the lyrical content could. When he's played it live most recently, the YouTube videos I've seen sound fantastic to my ear.
Something that has caught my eye is the discussion about Mary Margaret O'Hara's beautifully-dissonant contribution. Does this remind anyone of Morrissey's own lyrical-screams in I Wish You Lonely? I get the same kind of feeling there.